Some justices are indeed highly partisan......
This means they are not ruling based on the law it is to further an agenda twisting the meaning of the law.
=================
The Federalist
Jackson Accuses SCOTUS Of ‘Partiality’ She And Her Fellow Liberal Justices Are Guilty Of
If Jackson and her liberal colleagues had any interest in the Supreme Court avoiding ‘the appearance of partiality,’ they’d cut their left-wing political theater.
By: Shawn Fleetwood
May 05, 2026
Excerpt:
ne really has to admire the hutzpah of Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Not only is she comfortable signing off on some of the most asinine opinions imaginable, but she’s also shameless in gaslighting her conservative colleagues on “partiality” — an issue she and her fellow liberal justices know quite a bit about.
The latest incident occurred Monday evening when the Supreme Court released an order pertaining to its recently released Louisiana v. Callais decision kneecapping race-based redistricting. As The Federalist reported, the order fast-tracked transmission of the ruling to the lower courts so they and Louisiana could correct the latter’s unconstitutional congressional map ahead of the 2026 midterms.
LINK
This means they are not ruling based on the law it is to further an agenda twisting the meaning of the law.
=================
The Federalist
Jackson Accuses SCOTUS Of ‘Partiality’ She And Her Fellow Liberal Justices Are Guilty Of
If Jackson and her liberal colleagues had any interest in the Supreme Court avoiding ‘the appearance of partiality,’ they’d cut their left-wing political theater.
By: Shawn Fleetwood
May 05, 2026
Excerpt:
ne really has to admire the hutzpah of Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Not only is she comfortable signing off on some of the most asinine opinions imaginable, but she’s also shameless in gaslighting her conservative colleagues on “partiality” — an issue she and her fellow liberal justices know quite a bit about.
The latest incident occurred Monday evening when the Supreme Court released an order pertaining to its recently released Louisiana v. Callais decision kneecapping race-based redistricting. As The Federalist reported, the order fast-tracked transmission of the ruling to the lower courts so they and Louisiana could correct the latter’s unconstitutional congressional map ahead of the 2026 midterms.
LINK
Comment