Patriot Action
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
*Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
.
  • Search
  • Member List
  • Calendar
  • Help
Hello There, Guest! Login Register
Login
Username/Email:
Password:
Lost Password?
 
.
Join the discussions here at Patriot Action --->> New Registrations
Patriot Action › Earth › Climate Discussions - News v
1 2 3 4 Next »

The LWIR Puzzle: Experiments with MODTRAN

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode
The LWIR Puzzle: Experiments with MODTRAN
Sunsettommy Offline
Patriot Master
*******
Administrators
Posts: 1,520
Threads: 756
Joined: Aug 2022
Reputation: 62
#1
03-17-23, 09:42 PM
Watts Up With That?

The LWIR Puzzle: Experiments with MODTRAN

Kevin Kilty

March 17, 2023

Excerpt:

Much ink is spilled on this site, both in the articles themselves and in the threads that follow, on CO2 and its impact on long wave infrared radiation (LWIR). As a site visited by many skeptics of the CO2/global warming nexus, the bulk of these arguments seek to exonerate CO2 as a cause of a warming climate.

One common theme is that the relatively small effect a doubling of CO2 has on LWIR at the top of atmosphere (TOA) seems too small to produce the much larger effect needed for a 3K warming at the surface. Several articles from last summer called into question the claims of the IPCC versus the Stefan-Boltzmann law;[1][2] and many comments reflect this sentiment also. There appears to be a common misconception that was initiated and is perpetuated to the present time by the climate research community themselves. Let’s examine the problem of infrared transport in the atmosphere through some simple modeling. Some of these results may surprise folks.

LINK

=======

More indications that CO2 is a negligible plater in the heat budget.
“A theory that is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific.” – Karl Popper

Terms of Service

Moderation Guidelines



Find
Reply
Billy_Bob Offline
Systems Administration
*******
Webmaster
Posts: 1,544
Threads: 351
Joined: Sep 2022
Reputation: 68
#2
03-18-23, 08:47 AM
When you look at our oceans and then realize that all of the energy emitted from CO2 is in bands that never penetrate our ocean's surface layer you will find that the effect of the gas is greatly exaggerated by the modeling.  This goes to the old mantra "Garbage in = Garbage out".  IF you do not know what it is that your modeling, use assumptions, you will get it wrong.

Just the range they obtained, in outcomes, tells me things are not right with the inputs.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759


E-mail: systemadmin@patriotaction.us
Find
Reply
Sunsettommy Offline
Patriot Master
*******
Administrators
Posts: 1,520
Threads: 756
Joined: Aug 2022
Reputation: 62
#3
03-18-23, 09:12 AM
Their Pseudoscience crap is STOOOOPID!!!

So easily exposed as garbage yet many mainly democrats/leftists are easily swooned over the bogus AGW conjecture.

You saw how small the numbers were in the article and elsewhere for CO2 that doesn't even absorb more than around 6% of the entire IR bandwidth in the first place and that the main Terrestrial IR outflow is mostly outside of the main but very small CO2 14.77 area.

Angry
“A theory that is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific.” – Karl Popper

Terms of Service

Moderation Guidelines



Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »


  • View a Printable Version
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
  • Forum Team
  • Contact Us
  • Patriot Action
  • Return to Top
  • Lite (Archive) Mode
  • Mark all forums read
  • RSS Syndication
Current time: 03-27-23, 02:04 AM Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2023 MyBB Group.