09-11-23, 09:09 AM
I received a call from one of my children last night. She was in a panic on how to respond to one of her professors and his request to write a paper on several chapters in her psychology 101 textbook. I had her read it to me and to my astonishment it was a 100% Marxist ideology with trashing of the white race in general. My daughter asked me how she could respond in a neutral, non-political way.
I advised her there was no way to respond 'non-politically' and my first question for her professor was "how can I respond 'non-politicly' to a wholly political opinion piece?"
Chapter One was unashamed Marxism covered in the shroud of polling by a far-left school, looking at a poll, looking through a prism of Marxism. This is her opening and first look into the realm of today's psychology, used in every phycologist's office, in every social program and service in our country.
I chose to look into the polling. What I found was interesting. The poll was tightly constrained to people of color. This meant that their assumptions made were heavily skewed to that demographic. It also meant that their assumptions on "white people" in general, were made from this heavily skewed viewpoint. One of the main areas of controversy in my point of view was the "victim" always being due to the 'white' person. They assumed that all of the trauma in the child of colors life was due to a myriad of problems associated with a bias by the white person which a white person never has to endure.
This got me thinking about their premise in general. If holding a child of color responsible for their actions is causing harm, then why do they say a white child held responsible for their actions does not? They blame the heterosexual marriage for the harm in the colored child but not in the white child? why? The left has broken up the marriages of those of color thorough the welfare state, yet they curse us for wanting to limit or removal of the welfare state. They are creating perpetual victim hood but how does the white child escape this? The whole premise, of the root of psychology, is smashed to bits by the very poll they cite.
Needless to say but our schools are shoving political Marxism down their throats.
I advised her there was no way to respond 'non-politically' and my first question for her professor was "how can I respond 'non-politicly' to a wholly political opinion piece?"
Chapter One was unashamed Marxism covered in the shroud of polling by a far-left school, looking at a poll, looking through a prism of Marxism. This is her opening and first look into the realm of today's psychology, used in every phycologist's office, in every social program and service in our country.
I chose to look into the polling. What I found was interesting. The poll was tightly constrained to people of color. This meant that their assumptions made were heavily skewed to that demographic. It also meant that their assumptions on "white people" in general, were made from this heavily skewed viewpoint. One of the main areas of controversy in my point of view was the "victim" always being due to the 'white' person. They assumed that all of the trauma in the child of colors life was due to a myriad of problems associated with a bias by the white person which a white person never has to endure.
This got me thinking about their premise in general. If holding a child of color responsible for their actions is causing harm, then why do they say a white child held responsible for their actions does not? They blame the heterosexual marriage for the harm in the colored child but not in the white child? why? The left has broken up the marriages of those of color thorough the welfare state, yet they curse us for wanting to limit or removal of the welfare state. They are creating perpetual victim hood but how does the white child escape this? The whole premise, of the root of psychology, is smashed to bits by the very poll they cite.
Needless to say but our schools are shoving political Marxism down their throats.
Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
E-mail: systemadmin@patriotaction.us
